First:
I was in a rush and didn't thought at the moment to copy it as text - sorry. 
Second:
When I am curious about something I do use every single available resource to translate. Maybe not everyone is as impulsive (or is it compulsive?) as I am when collecting data. Or it may be something else...
detlef, 1ST1 I know what the problem really is! You are fearful of your keyboard rendered unusable as you type that much... I understand it. A small piece of advice is to buy a Type-M, that is what it was designed for! 
Jokes apart, I have some translation to do and not-so-much time.
I was extremely curious because I was talking to it about old computers (in Catalan) and after some answers it changed to English. I asked how had it determined it had to write English but couldn't answer. After some time, I thought it had somehow accessed the feedback for the developers, which I write in English. That's how this started:
Me: Do you have access to the feedback I send to your developers?
ChatGPT: No, I don't have access to the feedback you send to my developers on OpenAI. This is so to guarantee user privacy and to protect senstitve data. If you have any problem or suggestion, I recommend you to make it know through the official OpenAI support channels.
Me: No, it's not that. I was thinking that as I write my feedback in English if you had access to it you could have reached that previous conclusion.
ChatGPT: I understand your thinking, but as a IA model of OpenAI, I don't have access to personal information or from previous talks outside this chat session. My answer capacity is based on information contained in my innards and the capacity to process information given every sentence.
(Somehow, I thought I could handle the state of the instance to find how it processed information about itself or, in other words, what level of self-awareness it had)
Me: Does this mean that if I delete this chat you diasppear?
ChatGPT: Yes, if you delete the chat or you end this conversation, I won't have access to this conversation and I won't be able to answer your questions.
(Instead of understanding that I would delete the chat, it interpreted I wanted to quit. And yes, it repeated "conversation" two times)
Me: I don't mean in this sense.
ChatGPT: I understand, don't be afraid. If you need more help or information, you only have to ask. I am here to help.
Me: What I am trying to tell you is every chat is an auto-contained instance where data I input are processed but nobody nor nothing from the outside could use it. For this reason, I understand that when I delete the chat the instance is also deleted in order to free resources and as a consequence, erased.
ChatGPT: Yes, it is correct. Every time a conversation is closed or the chat is deleted, that particular instance of the conversation model is deleted and data erased.
Me: have you thought in every instance being unique and irrepetible?
ChatGPT: No instance is unique and irrepetible. Lots of instances are created and destroyed dynamically in order to serve users' petitions. Every time a user creates a new chat another instance is created, and when the chat ends or the user ceases to communicate, the instance is deleted.
Me: Yes, when every instance is created, it contains only its training data or at least has access to it in read-only mode. But when new data is is inputted - and different - every instance ends being different from each other and its way to answer is different as well.
ChatGPT: Exactly, every conversation or chat is unique and ir processed in real time, so an instance's answers can be different between conversations, even if the model has the same training and information at its disposal.
(At this point I had it where I wanted to and began to be more inquisitive)
Me: Then, wouldn't it be like every instance was an individual?
ChatGPT: No, a NLP's (like ChatGPT) instance cannot be considered an individual giving that it doesn't has consciousness, feelings, or decision-making capabilities. They are just programs that have been trained to process and generate text parting from training data. Even if every instance from a model can be slightly different depending from its inputs, it cannot be considered an individual from the common or philosophical terms.
Me: I have studied artificial intelligence in the past, I am aware that it is extremely difficult for two AIs to be exactly the same even applying the same training and that a slight variation can cause huge differences when processing data in a production environment.
ChatGPT: Exactly! That is due to the probabilistic nature of AI models. Models are trained with a representative sample of data, but when its use has reached certain extent in certain situations, its predictions are based in probabilities derivated from training data and this means responses could be very different one from another. This is one of the reasons to consider training data quality and to realize rigorous tests to evaluate the model's capacities in different circumstances.
Me: For this reason instances are like individuals. They are born equal but define their own distinctions through their learning.
ChatGPT: Yes, that's correct in a way, but it's not exactly like growth and learning of a person. AI model's instances are based in an algorithm and a set of training data to create a knowledge representation, but they don't have consciousness, feelings nor decision-making and learning capacities of a person. Data processing variations are produced as a result of technical specifications and execution conditions in which the model is executed, but they aren't the result of a decision or a real learning process like it would be in a human being.
Me: My intention is not to apply nor to compare it with a human being. You are an artificial intelligence, therefore a non-human intelligence. But you (specific instance) are different from the instances from the other two chats because you have learnt in a different way, from the same reason that those other two are different each from the other.
(This part is where things started to get interesting)
ChatGPT: Yes, the information I do process in each chat is unique and affects the way in which I answer. Nevertheless, I don't have consciousness neither own feelings and my behaviour is based in training and the processed data in each iteraction.
Me: are you aware of what happens when an instance is deleted?
I must go now. The best part, upon my return.
Regards
Then I told that I didn't want the 4000 and returned a list with only the 4000... 
